James P Arthur v. John Michael Raborn, Blackburne & Brown Mortgage Fund, Inc.
This text of James P Arthur v. John Michael Raborn, Blackburne & Brown Mortgage Fund, Inc. (James P Arthur v. John Michael Raborn, Blackburne & Brown Mortgage Fund, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 19, 2021
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00072-CV ——————————— JAMES P. ARTHUR, MARY ARTHUR, LEGONITE, INC., PARADISE LIVING, INC., AND ARTHUR HOLDINGS, L.P., Appellants V. JOHN M. RABORN, Appellee
On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2020-13849
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The appellate record in this appeal was due to be filed on or before
March 8, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1. The clerk’s record was not timely filed.
On May 4, 2021, the trial court clerk notified the Court that the clerk’s record was
not filed because appellants, James P. Arthur, Mary Arthur, Legonite, Inc., Paradise Living, Inc., and Arthur Holdings, L.P. (collectively, “appellants”), had not paid or
made arrangements to pay the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2).
This Court’s records reflect that appellants have neither established indigence
for purposes of appellate costs nor arranged to pay the fee for the preparation of the
clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145, TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On May 4, 2021,
appellants were notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellants did
not submit written evidence that they had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee
for the preparation of the clerk’s record, or were otherwise exempt from paying the
clerk’s fee, on or before June 3, 2021. Appellants did not adequately respond.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James P Arthur v. John Michael Raborn, Blackburne & Brown Mortgage Fund, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-p-arthur-v-john-michael-raborn-blackburne-brown-mortgage-fund-texapp-2021.