James Owen Spurlock v. State
This text of James Owen Spurlock v. State (James Owen Spurlock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-10-00214-CR
JAMES OWEN SPURLOCK, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 402nd Judicial District Court
Wood County, Texas
Trial Court No. 19,452-2006
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
MEMORANDUM OPINION
James Owen Spurlock has filed a pro se notice of appeal, claiming to appeal from the trial court’s denial of his post-conviction motion for DNA testing. We have now received the supplemental clerk’s record containing the order signed by the trial court December 22, 2010. That order denies only Spurlock’s request for appointment of counsel,[1] not Spurlock’s motion for post-conviction DNA testing.
An order denying appointed counsel under Article 64.01(c) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure is not appealable. Gutierrez v. State, 307 S.W.3d 318, 319, 323 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); see Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01(c) (Vernon Supp. 2010).
We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: January 5, 2011
Date Decided: January 6, 2011
Do Not Publish
[1]The trial court did not find that reasonable grounds existed for the motion that counsel be appointed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Owen Spurlock v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-owen-spurlock-v-state-texapp-2011.