James Otis Jones v. State
This text of James Otis Jones v. State (James Otis Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed and Opinion Filed February 8, 2018
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00159-CR
JAMES OTIS JONES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-81551-2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Myers, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Bridges James Otis Jones waived a jury and pleaded guilty to murder. During the punishment
phase, appellant pleaded not true to two enhancement paragraphs. After finding appellant guilty
and the enhancement paragraphs true, the trial court assessed punishment at life imprisonment and
a $10,000 fine. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect,
there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim.
App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets requirements of Anders). Counsel
delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App.
2014) (noting appellant has right to file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the
appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support
the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
/David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 170159F.U05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
JAMES OTIS JONES, Appellant On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas No. 05-17-00159-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. 380-81551-2015. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Myers and Schenck participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered February 8, 2018.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Otis Jones v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-otis-jones-v-state-texapp-2018.