James O. Mitchell v. United States

311 F.2d 777, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 91, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3237
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 1962
Docket17165_1
StatusPublished

This text of 311 F.2d 777 (James O. Mitchell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James O. Mitchell v. United States, 311 F.2d 777, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 91, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3237 (D.C. Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James O. Mitchell was observed by house detectives as he snatched a wallet from the purse of a woman in a crowded department store. He was immediately apprehended, and thereafter was indicted for robbery, tried and convicted.

On appeal, diligent counsel appointed to represent appellant complain that the detectives were permitted to testify they saw Mitchell touch the purses of other women in the store just before he was seen robbing the complaining witness. They say this was reversible error. We do not agree.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
311 F.2d 777, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 91, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-o-mitchell-v-united-states-cadc-1962.