James O. Gorman v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service
This text of 686 F.2d 263 (James O. Gorman v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
The Supreme Court has vacated our judgment (see 619 F.2d 1141) and remanded for further consideration in light of Army And Air Force Exchange Service v. Sheehan, 456 *264 U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2118, 72 L.Ed.2d 520 (1982). It is therefore decided, as in Sheehan, 686 F.2d 262 (5th Cir. 1982) that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction for Gorman’s monetary claim but does have jurisdiction for the nonmonetary claim.
The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED with respect to Sheehan’s claim for monetary relief, and REVERSED and REMANDED with respect to Sheehan’s claim for nonmonetary relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
686 F.2d 263, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-o-gorman-v-army-and-air-force-exchange-service-ca5-1982.