James O. Gorman v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service

686 F.2d 263, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25509
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 20, 1982
Docket79-1495
StatusPublished

This text of 686 F.2d 263 (James O. Gorman v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James O. Gorman v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service, 686 F.2d 263, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25509 (5th Cir. 1982).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before GOLDBERG, GARZA and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court has vacated our judgment (see 619 F.2d 1141) and remanded for further consideration in light of Army And Air Force Exchange Service v. Sheehan, 456 *264 U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2118, 72 L.Ed.2d 520 (1982). It is therefore decided, as in Sheehan, 686 F.2d 262 (5th Cir. 1982) that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction for Gorman’s monetary claim but does have jurisdiction for the nonmonetary claim.

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED with respect to Sheehan’s claim for monetary relief, and REVERSED and REMANDED with respect to Sheehan’s claim for nonmonetary relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 F.2d 263, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-o-gorman-v-army-and-air-force-exchange-service-ca5-1982.