James O. Gorman v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service

686 F.2d 263, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25509
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James O. Gorman v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service. Read the opinion of the Court — 619 F.2d 1141
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 20, 1982·No. 79-1495·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before GOLDBERG, GARZA and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court has vacated our judgment (see 619 F.2d 1141) and remanded for further consideration in light of Army And Air Force Exchange Service v. Sheehan, 456 *264 U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2118, 72 L.Ed.2d 520 (1982). It is therefore decided, as in Sheehan, 686 F.2d 262 (5th Cir. 1982) that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction for Gorman’s monetary claim but does have jurisdiction for the nonmonetary claim.

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED with respect to Sheehan’s claim for monetary relief, and REVERSED and REMANDED with respect to Sheehan’s claim for nonmonetary relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James O. Gorman v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service, 686 F.2d 263, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25509 (5th Cir. 1982).

686 F.2d 263 (James O. Gorman v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related