James Newbold's Lessee v. Stockley
1 Del. Cas. 10, 1793 Del. LEXIS 5
This text of 1 Del. Cas. 10 (James Newbold's Lessee v. Stockley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
James Newbold's Lessee v. Stockley, 1 Del. Cas. 10, 1793 Del. LEXIS 5 (Del. 1793).
Opinion
Motion by defendant for a new struck jury, which plaintiff’s attorney insisted should be at defendant’s own expense of strik[11]*11ing which he said had been done in the case of Conwell v. Conwell; which not appearing from the records, and Mr. Bassett [the clerk], asserting the practice to be contrary, the Court directed the costs to abide the event of the suit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nance v. Rees
161 A.2d 795 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1960)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Del. Cas. 10, 1793 Del. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-newbolds-lessee-v-stockley-del-1793.