James N. Meador and Melissa A. Meador v. EMC Mortgage Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 4, 2007
Docket07-07-00058-CV
StatusPublished

This text of James N. Meador and Melissa A. Meador v. EMC Mortgage Corporation (James N. Meador and Melissa A. Meador v. EMC Mortgage Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James N. Meador and Melissa A. Meador v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

NO. 07-07-0058-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

APRIL 4, 2007

______________________________

JAMES N. MEADOR AND MELISSA A. MEADOR,

Appellants

v.

EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION,

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 169TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY;

NO. 211,660-C; HON. GORDON G. ADAMS, PRESIDING _______________________________

Memorandum Opinion _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL AND PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellants James N. Meador and Melissa A. Meador appeal from a final judgment

of the trial court. We dismiss the appeal.

The clerk’s record was filed with this court on January 18, 2007, and the reporter’s

record was filed on January 24, 2007. Appellants’ brief, therefore, was due on February

23, 2007. By letter dated March 7, 2007, we notified appellants that the due date for the brief had passed, that the brief had not been filed and that no motion for extension of time

to file the brief had been received by the court. Citing Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

38.8 and 42.3, we also informed appellants that the appeal would be subject to dismissal

unless a brief accompanied by a response reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief

was filed by March 19, 2007. On March 8, 2007, appellants filed a motion to extend the

time to file his brief which was granted to March 26, 2007. To date, appellants have filed

neither a brief nor a motion requesting an extension of the lapsed deadline.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. TEX . R. APP. P.

38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b).

Brian Quinn Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James N. Meador and Melissa A. Meador v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-n-meador-and-melissa-a-meador-v-emc-mortgage-texapp-2007.