James N. Blakely v. Snap-On Tools Corporation
This text of 945 F.2d 411 (James N. Blakely v. Snap-On Tools Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
945 F.2d 411
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.
James N. BLAKELY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-3200.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
Oct. 1, 1991.
James N. Blakely appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Snap-On Tools Corporation. We have fully considered Blakely's contentions on appeal, and we are not persuaded that the district court committed reversible error.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
945 F.2d 411, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28580, 1991 WL 196260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-n-blakely-v-snap-on-tools-corporation-ca10-1991.