James Milton De Vone, Sr. v. Credit Bureau Systems, Incorporated

16 F.3d 409, 1994 WL 31447
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 1994
Docket93-2504
StatusPublished

This text of 16 F.3d 409 (James Milton De Vone, Sr. v. Credit Bureau Systems, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Milton De Vone, Sr. v. Credit Bureau Systems, Incorporated, 16 F.3d 409, 1994 WL 31447 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

16 F.3d 409
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Milton DE VONE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CREDIT BUREAU SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-2504.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 20, 1994.
Decided Feb. 2, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-85-1)

James Milton De Vone, pro se.

Joseph H. Nanney, Jr., Moore & Van Allen, Durham, NC, for appellee.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R.App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robinson
361 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 1960)
Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.
434 U.S. 257 (Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 F.3d 409, 1994 WL 31447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-milton-de-vone-sr-v-credit-bureau-systems-in-ca4-1994.