James Michael McKillop v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 25, 2006
Docket07-06-00001-CR
StatusPublished

This text of James Michael McKillop v. State (James Michael McKillop v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Michael McKillop v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

NO. 07-06-0001-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 25, 2006

______________________________

JAMES MICHAEL MCKILLOP, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 17,375-C; HONORABLE PATRICK A. PIRTLE, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea of guilty, appellant James Michael McKillop was granted deferred

adjudication for burglary of a building and placed on community supervision for four years.

An $800 fine was not suspended. Proceeding pro se, appellant filed a notice of appeal

expressing a desire to challenge community supervision. The trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal reflects this is a plea-

bargain case with no right of appeal and that appellant waived his right of appeal. By letter

dated January 11, 2006, this Court notified appellant that the certification indicated no right

of appeal and requested a response by January 23, 2006. The Court noted that failure to

file an amended certification showing a right of appeal or failure to provide other grounds

for continuing the appeal might result in dismissal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

The letter to appellant was returned by the United States Post Office with a

designation of “unable to forward.” Efforts by the Clerk of this Court to obtain a current

address for appellant proved unsuccessful. Based on the certification, we have no choice

but to dismiss the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Don H. Reavis Justice

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Michael McKillop v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-michael-mckillop-v-state-texapp-2006.