James McLean, Jr. v. Warden FCI Estill

711 F. App'x 146
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 12, 2018·No. 17-7216·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding . precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Edward McLean, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McLean v. Warden, No. 9:16-cv-02956-MGL, 2017 WL 8783128 (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James McLean, Jr. v. Warden FCI Estill, 711 F. App'x 146 (4th Cir. 2018).

711 F. App'x 146 (James McLean, Jr. v. Warden FCI Estill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McLean v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
W.D. North Carolina, 2020