James McKinney & Son, Inc. v. Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, Inc.

95 A.D.2d 897, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18868
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James McKinney & Son, Inc. v. Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 A.D.2d 991

Opinion

— Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, [898]*898which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: “Was so much of Special Term’s order as denied defendant Gilbane Building Company’s motion to dismiss the complaint as against it correct, as a matter of law?” Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Main, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James McKinney & Son, Inc. v. Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, Inc., 95 A.D.2d 897, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

95 A.D.2d 897 (James McKinney & Son, Inc. v. Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.