James McCreery Realty Corp. v. Equitable National Bank

203 U.S. 584, 51 L. Ed. 328, 27 S. Ct. 782, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1643
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 19, 1906
DocketNo. 109
StatusPublished

This text of 203 U.S. 584 (James McCreery Realty Corp. v. Equitable National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James McCreery Realty Corp. v. Equitable National Bank, 203 U.S. 584, 51 L. Ed. 328, 27 S. Ct. 782, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1643 (1906).

Opinion

In error to the City Court of the city of New York.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs. Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658; McCormick v. Market National Bank, 165 U. S. 538; California National Bank v. Kennedy, 167 U. S. 367.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dower v. Richards
151 U.S. 658 (Supreme Court, 1894)
McCormick v. Market Bank
165 U.S. 538 (Supreme Court, 1897)
California Bank v. Kennedy
167 U.S. 362 (Supreme Court, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 U.S. 584, 51 L. Ed. 328, 27 S. Ct. 782, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-mccreery-realty-corp-v-equitable-national-bank-scotus-1906.