James Marshall v. Dolores Largent

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 21, 2017
Docket03-17-00277-CV
StatusPublished

This text of James Marshall v. Dolores Largent (James Marshall v. Dolores Largent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Marshall v. Dolores Largent, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-17-00277-CV

James Marshall, Appellant

v.

Dolores Largent, Appellee

FROM THE PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-PB-16-001302, THE HONORABLE GUY S. HERMAN, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on June 26, 2017.

On June 28, 2017, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to his failure to

pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice

requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report

regarding this appeal by July 7, 2017. Further, the notice advised appellant that his failure to

comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. To

date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the

clerk’s record has not been filed.

If a trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to

pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court

may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established

that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because

appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s

record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: July 21, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Marshall v. Dolores Largent, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-marshall-v-dolores-largent-texapp-2017.