James Malcolm Bearden v. United States

Fifth Circuit

James Malcolm Bearden v. United States

277 F.2d 802, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4759

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 1960

Docket18036

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 277 F.2d 802 (James Malcolm Bearden v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Malcolm Bearden v. United States, 277 F.2d 802, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4759 (5th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction under a one count indictment charging the defendant with wilfully failing and refusing to render a correct return of the disposition of 183 100-pound bags of sugar in violation of Sections 5213 and 5609, Title 26, U.S.Code. * The main contention is that the defendant was entitled to a judgment of acquittal on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence. We think that there was adequate evidence to support the jury’s verdict. We find no reversible error in the Court’s charge. The judgment is

Affirmed.

*

Now 26 U.S.C.A. (I.R.C.1954) §§ 5291, 5605.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction under a one count indictment charging the defendant with wilfully failing and refusing to render a correct return of the disposition of 183 100-pound bags of sugar in violation of Sections 5213 and 5609, Title 26, U.S.Code. * The main contention is that the defendant was entitled to a judgment of acquittal on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence. We think that there was adequate evidence to support the jury’s verdict. We find no reversible error in the Court’s charge. The judgment is

Affirmed.

*

Now 26 U.S.C.A. (I.R.C.1954) §§ 5291, 5605.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 F.2d 802, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-malcolm-bearden-v-united-states-ca5-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack