James M. Zanoni v. Richman Bry
This text of James M. Zanoni v. Richman Bry (James M. Zanoni v. Richman Bry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:24-cv-761-MOC JAMES M. ZANONI, ) ) ) ) VS. ) ORDER ) ) RICHMAN BRY, ) ) ) Defendant. ) □□ THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. (Doc. No. 10). Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on October 15, 2024. (Doc. No. 13). Because Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint, the pending motion to dismiss the Original Complaint is moot. See Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001) (“The general rule ... is that an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, rendering the original pleading of no effect.”); Turner v. Kight, 192 F. Supp. 2d 391, 397 (D. Md. 2002) (denying as moot motions to dismiss original complaint on grounds that amended complaint superseded original complaint). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. No. 10), is DENIED as moot.
Signed: December 16, 2024 Mostboee2S/ Max O. Cogburn i ,) United States District Judge Tog t
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James M. Zanoni v. Richman Bry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-m-zanoni-v-richman-bry-cacd-2024.