James M. v. Melanie U.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

James M. v. Melanie U.

24 A.D.3d 162, 807 N.Y.S.2d 18

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.3d 162 (James M. v. Melanie U.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James M. v. Melanie U., 24 A.D.3d 162, 807 N.Y.S.2d 18 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal, from order, Family Court, New York County (George L. Jurow, J.), entered on or about October 28, 2004, which granted respondent mother’s application for a temporary order of custody of the child, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Subsequent to the temporary custody disposition granted by the order appealed, a trial was held. That trial resulted in an order (Ruth Jane Zuckerman, J.H.O.), entered on or about August 18, 2005, which awarded the mother sole physical and legal custody of the subject child. The father has filed a notice of appeal from that order. Because a permanent custody determination has been made, we dismiss the appeal from the temporary order of custody. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal, from order, Family Court, New York County (George L. Jurow, J.), entered on or about October 28, 2004, which granted respondent mother’s application for a temporary order of custody of the child, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Subsequent to the temporary custody disposition granted by the order appealed, a trial was held. That trial resulted in an order (Ruth Jane Zuckerman, J.H.O.), entered on or about August 18, 2005, which awarded the mother sole physical and legal custody of the subject child. The father has filed a notice of appeal from that order. Because a permanent custody determination has been made, we dismiss the appeal from the temporary order of custody. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.3d 162, 807 N.Y.S.2d 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-m-v-melanie-u-nyappdiv-2005.