James, M. v. CCP Phila. Cty.
This text of James, M. v. CCP Phila. Cty. (James, M. v. CCP Phila. Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
MICHAEL JAMES, : No. 29 EM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY; AND COURT : OF COMMON PLEAS PRESIDENT : JUDGE OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY; : AND COURT ADMINISTRATOR OF : COMMON PLEAS COURT OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2015, the Application Leave to File Leave
Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are GRANTED.
The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County has failed to comply with the
remand order of the Superior Court. See Commonwealth v. James, 116 EDA 2009
(December 14, 2009). The common pleas court is DIRECTED to adjudicate the
remanded Post Conviction Relief Act matter within 60 days.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve the Commonwealth with a copy of this
order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James, M. v. CCP Phila. Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-m-v-ccp-phila-cty-pa-2015.