James M. Sinclair, Jr., and v. Anna Rosa Boughton, Etc., And
419 F.2d 129, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12123
Opinion
ORDER
Jurisdiction of this action was based on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Plaintiff alleged that he was a citizen of California and that defendant was a citizen of the province of Ontario, Canada. The trial judge correctly found that defendant was a citizen of California. Thus, there was no jurisdiction. The action was dismissed on that ground, among others. We do not pass upon the other grounds.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James M. Sinclair, Jr., and v. Anna Rosa Boughton, Etc., And, 419 F.2d 129, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12123 (9th Cir. 1969).
419 F.2d 129 (James M. Sinclair, Jr., and v. Anna Rosa Boughton, Etc., And) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs
28 U.S.C. § 1332