James M. Sinclair, Jr., and v. Anna Rosa Boughton, Etc., And

Ninth Circuit

James M. Sinclair, Jr., and v. Anna Rosa Boughton, Etc., And

419 F.2d 129, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12123

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 3, 1969

Docket22005

StatusPublished

This text of 419 F.2d 129 (James M. Sinclair, Jr., and v. Anna Rosa Boughton, Etc., And) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James M. Sinclair, Jr., and v. Anna Rosa Boughton, Etc., And, 419 F.2d 129, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12123 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jurisdiction of this action was based on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Plaintiff alleged that he was a citizen of California and that defendant was a citizen of the province of Ontario, Canada. The trial judge correctly found that defendant was a citizen of California. Thus, there was no jurisdiction. The action was dismissed on that ground, among others. We do not pass upon the other grounds.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jurisdiction of this action was based on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Plaintiff alleged that he was a citizen of California and that defendant was a citizen of the province of Ontario, Canada. The trial judge correctly found that defendant was a citizen of California. Thus, there was no jurisdiction. The action was dismissed on that ground, among others. We do not pass upon the other grounds.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

419 F.2d 129, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-m-sinclair-jr-and-v-anna-rosa-boughton-etc-and-ca9-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack