James M. Phillips v. Alabama Credit Corporation D/B/A Fidelity Securities Corporation
This text of 403 F.2d 692 (James M. Phillips v. Alabama Credit Corporation D/B/A Fidelity Securities Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Phillips appeals from a directed verdict in favor of Alabama Credit Corp. on three counts of securities fraud in violation of §§ 12(2), 17 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 77l(2), 77q, and the Alabama misrepresentation statute, 7 Ala.Code § 108 (1958). 1
Phillips offered no evidence to contradict the overwhelming proof that he committed the fraudulent acts. The only evidence offered by Phillips was reputation testimony from friends and associates. It is clear that fraudulent intent need not be proved and that testimony of the defendant’s reputation in the community is not enough to refute overwhelming proof of fraud. Wilko v. Swan, 1953, 346 U.S. 427, 431, 74 S.Ct. 182, 98 L.Ed. 168, 173; S.E.C. v. Capital Gaines Research Bureau, 1963, 375 U.S. 180, 192, 195, 84 S.Ct. 275, 283-284, 11 *693 L.Ed.2d 237, 246, 248; Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. Osborne, 1945, 32 Ala.App. 220, 23 So.2d 864, cert. denied, 247 Ala. 252, 23 So.2d 867.
Affirmed.
. This is a companion case to Phillips v. Alabama Credit Corp., 403 F.2d 693, decided this day, which involved violations of these same statutes.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
403 F.2d 692, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-m-phillips-v-alabama-credit-corporation-dba-fidelity-securities-ca5-1968.