James M. Hollis v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
• Decided: September 28, 2023
• Docket: A24A0218
• Status: Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ September 28, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A0218. JAMES M. HOLLIS v. THE STATE.

In December 2017, James M. Hollis pleaded guilty to two counts of computer

or electronic pornography and child exploitation, for which he was sentenced to

fifteen years with the first two years to serve in confinement and the remainder on

probation. After failing to show proof that he entered a sex offender treatment

program, a special condition of his probation, the trial court revoked seven years of

Hollis’s probation in March 2020. Hollis subsequently filed a motion to vacate his

sentence, which the trial court denied. Hollis then filed this direct appeal. We,

however, lack jurisdiction.

“In determining the proper procedure to follow in pursuing an appeal, the

underlying subject matter generally controls over the relief sought.” Self v. Bayneum,

265 Ga. 14, 14-15 (453 SE2d 27) (1995). Because the underlying subject matter of

this appeal is the revocation of Hollis’s probation, he was required to file an

application for discretionary appeal in order to obtain appellate review of the trial

court’s order. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (5), (b); Todd v. State, 236 Ga. App. 757, 758

(513 SE2d 287) (1999). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471

SE2d 60) (1996). Hollis’s failure to follow the proper procedure deprives us of

jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 09/28/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.