James M. Beggs, Lynda Landers, and Beggs Landers Law Firm, PLLC v. Clark, Love & Hutson, PLLC and Clark, Love & Hutson, GP
Opinion
NUMBER 13-19-00446-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
JAMES M. BEGGS, LYNDA LANDERS, AND BEGGS LANDERS LAW FIRM, PLLC, Appellants,
v.
CLARK, LOVE & HUTSON, PLLC, AND CLARK, LOVE & HUTSON, G.P., Appellees.
On appeal from the 23rd District Court of Wharton County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Perkes Order Per Curiam
This cause is before the Court on appellants’ unopposed motion to stay proceedings in the trial court pending their interlocutory appeal of the trial court's denial of a motion to dismiss pursuant to § 27.003 pursuant to § 51.014(a)(12). See TEX. CIV.
PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 27.003, 51.014 (a)(4). This Court, having fully examined and considered appellants’ motion is of the opinion that appellants’ unopposed motion to stay the trial and all other proceedings in the trial court is GRANTED and the trial of this matter is ordered STAYED pending further order of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 13th day of November, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James M. Beggs, Lynda Landers, and Beggs Landers Law Firm, PLLC v. Clark, Love & Hutson, PLLC and Clark, Love & Hutson, GP (James M. Beggs, Lynda Landers, and Beggs Landers Law Firm, PLLC v. Clark, Love & Hutson, PLLC and Clark, Love & Hutson, GP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.