James M. And Miriam G. Carpenter D/B/A Carpenter Radio Company v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America

774 F.2d 1161, 1985 WL 13757
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 20, 1985
Docket85-3331
StatusUnpublished

This text of 774 F.2d 1161 (James M. And Miriam G. Carpenter D/B/A Carpenter Radio Company v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James M. And Miriam G. Carpenter D/B/A Carpenter Radio Company v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, 774 F.2d 1161, 1985 WL 13757 (6th Cir. 1985).

Opinion

774 F.2d 1161

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
James M. and Miriam G. Carpenter D/B/A Carpenter Radio
Company, Petitioner,
v.
Federal Communications Commission and United States of
America, Respondents.

No. 85-3331

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

9/20/85

F.C.C.

DISMISSED

ORDER

BEFORE: ENGEL, KRUPANSKY and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the Court upon consideration of the petitioners' response to this Court's show cause order, the motions to dismiss and the responses thereto.

A review of the file indicates that the petition for review was filed on April 26, 1985, from the order released on March 26, 1985. Said petition was filed within the 60 day period provided by 47 U.S.C. Sec. 402(b). However, the petitioners filed a motion for reconsideration with the Federal Communications Commission on April 25, 1985. The petition for reconsideration filed within the 30 day period provided by 47 U.S.C. Sec. 405 suspended the time for filing a petition for review. City of Gallup v. F.E.R.C., 702 F.2d 1116 (D.C. Cir. 1983); Southland Industries v. FCC, 99 F.2d 117 (D.C. Cir. 1938).

It is ORDERED that the motions to dismiss the petition for review as premature be granted and the case be and it hereby is dismissed.

It is further ORDERED that the show cause order be and hereby is discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
774 F.2d 1161, 1985 WL 13757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-m-and-miriam-g-carpenter-dba-carpenter-radio-ca6-1985.