James LoVerde, M.D. v. Regional Employee Assistance Program

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 19, 2018
Docket13-18-00044-CV
StatusPublished

This text of James LoVerde, M.D. v. Regional Employee Assistance Program (James LoVerde, M.D. v. Regional Employee Assistance Program) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James LoVerde, M.D. v. Regional Employee Assistance Program, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-18-00044-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

JAMES LOVERDE, M.D., Appellant,

v.

REGIONAL EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 13th District Court of Navarro County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Valdez

Appellant, James LoVerde, M.D., filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the

13th District Court of Navarro County, Texas, in cause number D-16-24991-CV. 1

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals in Waco pursuant to a

docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.). Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties

have entered into an agreement resolving the dispute between the parties. Appellant

requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is

hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

/s/ Rogelio Valdez ROGELIO VALDEZ Chief Justice

Delivered and filed the 19th day of April, 2018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 73.001
Texas GV § 73.001

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James LoVerde, M.D. v. Regional Employee Assistance Program, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-loverde-md-v-regional-employee-assistance-program-texapp-2018.