James Louis Lee, Jr. v. Samuel v. Pruett

45 F.3d 426, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5843, 1995 WL 3797
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 6, 1995
Docket94-6293
StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.3d 426 (James Louis Lee, Jr. v. Samuel v. Pruett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Louis Lee, Jr. v. Samuel v. Pruett, 45 F.3d 426, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5843, 1995 WL 3797 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

45 F.3d 426
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Louis LEE, Jr., Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Samuel V. PRUETT, Respondent Appellee.

No. 94-6293.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 8, 1994.
Decided Jan. 6, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-401).

James Louis Lee, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Oliver Lewis Norrell, III, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lee v. Pruett, No. CA-93-401 (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 F.3d 426, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5843, 1995 WL 3797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-louis-lee-jr-v-samuel-v-pruett-ca4-1995.