James Lewis v. Navient Solutions, Inc.
This text of 618 F. App'x 301 (James Lewis v. Navient Solutions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James Lewis brought this pro se action against Navient Solutions, Inc., asserting violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, among other claims. He appeals from the orders of the District Court 1 granting summary judgment in favor of Navient and denying his post-judgment motion under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, and we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted. See Anderson v. EMC Mortg. Corp., 631 F.3d 905, 906 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing the grant of summary judgment de novo). We further conclude that the denial of post-judgment relief was not an abuse of discretion. See Innovative Home Health Care, Inc. v. P.T.-O.T. As-socs. of the Black Hills, 141 F.3d 1284, 1286 (8th Cir.1998) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm.
. The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
618 F. App'x 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-lewis-v-navient-solutions-inc-ca8-2015.