James Lewis McGruder v. the State of Texas

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: May 12, 2025
• Docket: 07-24-00413-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-24-00413-CR

JAMES LEWIS MCGRUDER, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 100th District Court Childress County, Texas Trial Court No. 6939, Counts I, II, III, IV & V; Honorable Ron Enns, Presiding

May 12, 2025 ABATE AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.

Appellant, James Lewis McGruder, appeals his convictions for assault, 1 three

counts of burglary, 2 and aggravated assault. 3 Now pending before this Court is

Appellant’s “Agreed Motion to Correct and Supplement the Reporter’s Record.” In the

motion, Appellant contends that the court reporter failed to transcribe several bench

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01.

2 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02.

3 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02. conferences during which objections were made and rulings issued. Appellant claims the

reporter’s record incorrectly reflects that the bench conferences occurred “off the record.”

He requests that we direct the reporter to correct the alleged inaccuracies by preparing a

supplemental reporter’s record transcribing the specified bench conferences. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 34.6(d), (e). The motion is unopposed by the State.

In order to rule on Appellant’s motion, we abate the appeal and remand the cause

to the trial court for further proceedings. On remand, the trial court shall make findings of

fact and conclusions of law on the following matters:

(1) whether Appellant or the State requested that the reporter be present and record the specified bench conferences;

(2) whether the reporter was, in fact, present and recorded said bench conferences; and

(3) whether Appellant or the State objected to the reporter’s absence or failure to record any of the bench conferences.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 13.1(a) (“The official court reporter or court recorder must,

unless excused by agreement of the parties, attend court sessions and make a full

record of the proceedings. . .”); Valle v. State, 109 S.W.3d 500, 508–09 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2003) (holding that a defendant must object to a court reporter’s failure to

record bench conferences to preserve error on appeal).

The trial court shall convene those hearings it deems necessary to address

the aforementioned questions and afford the parties reasonable notice of same. If

any such hearing is conducted, the trial court shall cause it to be recorded,

transcribed, and filed with the Clerk of this Court; it must be so filed by June 2, 2025.

So too shall the trial court issue written findings of fact and conclusions of law

addressing the foregoing questions. Said findings shall be included in a

2 supplemental clerk’s record. Said supplemental clerk’s record must be filed with

the clerk of this court by June 2, 2025, as well.

If the trial court finds that the bench conferences in question were not “off

the record” and they were recorded, the trial court is further directed to order that

the reporter prepare a supplemental reporter’s record containing their transcription.

The court reporter is then directed to file that transcription on or before June 9,

2025, unless that deadline is otherwise extended by this Court.

All appellate deadlines, including the present deadline to file Appellant’s

brief, are hereby suspended pending further order of this Court.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.