James Lester Roundabush, Jr. v. North Carolina Department of Corrections

914 F.2d 1492
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 23, 1990
Docket90-7091
StatusUnpublished

This text of 914 F.2d 1492 (James Lester Roundabush, Jr. v. North Carolina Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Lester Roundabush, Jr. v. North Carolina Department of Corrections, 914 F.2d 1492 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

914 F.2d 1492
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Lester ROUNDABUSH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-7091.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 27, 1990.
Decided Sept. 27, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Oct. 23, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-90-350-CRT)

James Lester Roundabush, Jr., appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

James Lester Roundabush, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Roundabush v. North Carolina Dept. of Corrections, CA-90-350-CRT (E.D.N.C. July 19, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
914 F.2d 1492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-lester-roundabush-jr-v-north-carolina-department-of-corrections-ca4-1990.