James Lenard Small v. Aaron Johnson, Dwight Sanderson, Bert Rosefield, J.C. Harris, Jr., William Dudley, Bert Estworthy, Jim G. Bullock, M.L. Smith

854 F.2d 1317, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10893, 1988 WL 83452
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 4, 1988
Docket88-6646
StatusUnpublished

This text of 854 F.2d 1317 (James Lenard Small v. Aaron Johnson, Dwight Sanderson, Bert Rosefield, J.C. Harris, Jr., William Dudley, Bert Estworthy, Jim G. Bullock, M.L. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Lenard Small v. Aaron Johnson, Dwight Sanderson, Bert Rosefield, J.C. Harris, Jr., William Dudley, Bert Estworthy, Jim G. Bullock, M.L. Smith, 854 F.2d 1317, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10893, 1988 WL 83452 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

854 F.2d 1317
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Lenard SMALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Aaron JOHNSON, Dwight Sanderson, Bert Rosefield, J.C.
Harris, Jr., William Dudley, Bert Estworthy, Jim
G. Bullock, M.L. Smith, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-6646.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 28, 1988.
Decided Aug. 4, 1988.

James Lenard Small, appellant pro se.

Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

James Lenard Small appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Small v. Johnson, C/A No. 87-421-CRT (E.D.N.C. Apr. 22, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thacker (Robert) v. Bumgarner (Michael E.)
854 F.2d 1317 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
854 F.2d 1317, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10893, 1988 WL 83452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-lenard-small-v-aaron-johnson-dwight-sanderson-bert-rosefield-jc-ca4-1988.