James Lee Farrow v. Grace Lines, Inc.
381 F.2d 380, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5583, 1967 A.M.C. 2329
Opinion
We think the District Court was well within its discretionary authority in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury on the ground of inadequacy. The amount of the verdict was small, but within the range permitted by the testimony.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James Lee Farrow v. Grace Lines, Inc., 381 F.2d 380, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5583, 1967 A.M.C. 2329 (4th Cir. 1967).
381 F.2d 380 (James Lee Farrow v. Grace Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.