James Lee Farrow v. Grace Lines, Inc.
381 F.2d 380, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5583, 1967 A.M.C. 2329
This text of 381 F.2d 380 (James Lee Farrow v. Grace Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
James Lee Farrow v. Grace Lines, Inc., 381 F.2d 380, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5583, 1967 A.M.C. 2329 (4th Cir. 1967).
Opinion
We think the District Court was well within its discretionary authority in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury on the ground of inadequacy. The amount of the verdict was small, but within the range permitted by the testimony.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
381 F.2d 380, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5583, 1967 A.M.C. 2329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-lee-farrow-v-grace-lines-inc-ca4-1967.