James Lawrence McCarty v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 10, 2016
Docket14-16-00085-CR
StatusPublished

This text of James Lawrence McCarty v. State (James Lawrence McCarty v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Lawrence McCarty v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Motion Granted; Order filed May 10, 2016

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-16-00085-CR ____________

JAMES LAWRENCE MCCARTY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1431305

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion in which he requested to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted. Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 230th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before May 25, 2016; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Lawrence McCarty v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-lawrence-mccarty-v-state-texapp-2016.