James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED No. 18-30652 May 8, 2019 _____________________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk JAMES A. LATIOLAIS, Plaintiff - Appellee v.
HUNTINGTON INGALLS, INCORPORATED, formerly known as Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Incorporated, formerly known as Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Incorporated, formerly known as Avondale Industries, Incorporated, Defendant - Appellant
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana __________________________
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion March 11, 2019, 5 Cir., 2019, 918 F.3d 406)
Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON, COSTA, WILLETT, HO, DUNCAN, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. 1
BY THE COURT:
A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,
1 Judge Engelhardt is recused and did not participate in this decision. No. 18-30652
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated (James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.