James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated. Read the opinion of the Court — 951 F.3d 286
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 8, 2019·No. 18-30652·Published

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 18-30652 May 8, 2019 _____________________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk JAMES A. LATIOLAIS, Plaintiff - Appellee v.

HUNTINGTON INGALLS, INCORPORATED, formerly known as Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Incorporated, formerly known as Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Incorporated, formerly known as Avondale Industries, Incorporated, Defendant - Appellant

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana __________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 11, 2019, 5 Cir., 2019, 918 F.3d 406)

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON, COSTA, WILLETT, HO, DUNCAN, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. 1

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

1 Judge Engelhardt is recused and did not participate in this decision. No. 18-30652

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated, (5th Cir. 2019).

James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated (James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated
918 F.3d 406 (Fifth Circuit, 2019)