James Lane Kendall v. John H. Klinger, Superintendent, California Men's Colony, Los Padres, California

383 F.2d 436
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 22, 1967
Docket21029
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 383 F.2d 436 (James Lane Kendall v. John H. Klinger, Superintendent, California Men's Colony, Los Padres, California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Lane Kendall v. John H. Klinger, Superintendent, California Men's Colony, Los Padres, California, 383 F.2d 436 (9th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

*437 PER CURIAM:

The appeal is dismissed as moot because the appellant has been released from state custody. See Parker v. Ellis, 362 U.S. 574, 80 S.Ct. 909, 4 L.Ed.2d 963.

Were we to pass over this point, which we cannot, it could be suggested to appellant that he has made no attack on the first of two convictions. Thus, civil rights to vote (which he now wants to vindicate here) could not be vindicated because of the first conviction, even if we could eradicate his second conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Brady v. U. S. Parole Commission
600 F.2d 234 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
383 F.2d 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-lane-kendall-v-john-h-klinger-superintendent-california-mens-ca9-1967.