James Lane Kendall v. John H. Klinger, Superintendent, California Men's Colony, Los Padres, California

383 F.2d 436
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 22, 1967·No. 21029·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*437 PER CURIAM:

The appeal is dismissed as moot because the appellant has been released from state custody. See Parker v. Ellis, 362 U.S. 574, 80 S.Ct. 909, 4 L.Ed.2d 963.

Were we to pass over this point, which we cannot, it could be suggested to appellant that he has made no attack on the first of two convictions. Thus, civil rights to vote (which he now wants to vindicate here) could not be vindicated because of the first conviction, even if we could eradicate his second conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Lane Kendall v. John H. Klinger, Superintendent, California Men's Colony, Los Padres, California, 383 F.2d 436 (9th Cir. 1967).

383 F.2d 436 (James Lane Kendall v. John H. Klinger, Superintendent, California Men's Colony, Los Padres, California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John Brady v. U. S. Parole Commission
600 F.2d 234 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)