James Lafurn Wheat v. United States

587 F.2d 798, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 17621
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 15, 1979·No. 78-2591·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James LaFurn Wheat pled guilty to a three count indictment alleging that he had possessed a check stolen from the mail, that he forged the check, and that he uttered and published the check. He received a prison sentence totaling twenty-five years. He then filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his sentence, which the district court denied. Wheat appeals the denial of his motion, and we affirm.

Wheat contends that the sentencing judge erred in relying on a false presen-tencing report that stated that Wheat had been arrested on sixty separate occasions prior to his conviction. He also asserts that he cannot be convicted of both forging and uttering a stolen check. He contends that the district court erred in failing to hold a hearing to resolve the factual issues underlying his § 2255 motion.

We have examined each of Wheat’s assignments of error and find them to be without merit.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Lafurn Wheat v. United States, 587 F.2d 798, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 17621 (5th Cir. 1979).

587 F.2d 798 (James Lafurn Wheat v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wheat v. United States
590 F.2d 333 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)