James L. Taliaferro, Robert K. Taliaferro, and Gary Dumas, Trustee of the Amy Dumas Family Trust v. Connie Perryman
This text of James L. Taliaferro, Robert K. Taliaferro, and Gary Dumas, Trustee of the Amy Dumas Family Trust v. Connie Perryman (James L. Taliaferro, Robert K. Taliaferro, and Gary Dumas, Trustee of the Amy Dumas Family Trust v. Connie Perryman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AND GARY DUMAS, TRUSTEE OF THE
AMY DUMAS FAMILY TRUST, Appellants
James L. Taliaferro filed a motion to dismiss his appeal because a new trial had been granted. Thereafter, we determined that two other parties had also filed notices of appeal. We contacted those parties to determine whether they concurred in the dismissal. Although the other parties have not filed their own motions to dismiss, they have not indicated any disagreement with that result.
We have now received a copy of the order granting new trial. It is apparent that as a result of that order, the previously appealed from judgment is not final. We have jurisdiction over only appeals from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Therefore, this Court is without jurisdiction to hear this appeal.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Jack Carter
Justice
Date Submitted: May 27, 2009
Date Decided: May 28, 2009
7in"> A defendant must file the notice of appeal within thirty days from the date the trial court imposes or suspends sentence unless the defendant timely files a motion for new trial, in which case the notice of appeal must be filed within ninety days from the date the trial court imposes or suspends sentence. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2. An appellate court may, however, extend the time to file the notice of appeal "if, within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the party: (a) files in the trial court the notice of appeal; and (b) files in the appellate court a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b)." Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.
In this case, the record clearly shows Williamson did not file a timely motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(a) (motion shall be filed no later than thirty days after sentence is imposed or suspended). Accordingly, his notice of appeal was due by April 22, 2004. It was not filed until August 3, 2004.
Williamson did not timely invoke this Court's jurisdiction. The record does not indicate he has been granted an out-of-time appeal by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: August 11, 2004
Date Decided: August 12, 2004
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James L. Taliaferro, Robert K. Taliaferro, and Gary Dumas, Trustee of the Amy Dumas Family Trust v. Connie Perryman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-l-taliaferro-robert-k-taliaferro-and-gary-du-texapp-2009.