James L. Shores, Jr., as of the Estate of Clarence E. Bishop, Jr., Etc. v. Jerald H. Sklar

617 F.2d 441, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17931
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 2, 1980
Docket77-2896
StatusPublished

This text of 617 F.2d 441 (James L. Shores, Jr., as of the Estate of Clarence E. Bishop, Jr., Etc. v. Jerald H. Sklar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James L. Shores, Jr., as of the Estate of Clarence E. Bishop, Jr., Etc. v. Jerald H. Sklar, 617 F.2d 441, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17931 (5th Cir. 1980).

Opinion

617 F.2d 441

James L. SHORES, Jr., as Executor of the Estate of Clarence
E. Bishop, Jr., etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Jerald H. SKLAR et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 77-2896.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 2, 1980.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; James Hughes Hancock, Judge.

W. Eugene Rutledge, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants.

George B. Azar, Montgomery, Ala., for Rakerd.

Frank M. Young, III, Birmingham, Ala., for Cecil Lamberson & Jackson Municipals.

Meade Whitaker, Jr., Hobart McWhorter, Jr., Samuel H. Franklin, Birmingham, Ala., for Capell, Howard, Knabe & Cobbs.

Henry E. Simpson, Birmingham, Ala., for First Alabama Bank of Phenix City.

B. G. Minisman, Jr., Crawford S. McGivaren, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for Asa G. Candler, V.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Jan. 21, 1980, 5 Cir., 1980, 610 F.2d 235).

Before COLEMAN, Chief Judge, and BROWN, AINSWORTH, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, KARVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON and THOMAS A. CLARK, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

*

Judges Godbold and Vance have recused themselves and did not participate in this decision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
617 F.2d 441, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-l-shores-jr-as-of-the-estate-of-clarence-e-bishop-jr-etc-v-ca5-1980.