JAMES L. ROBISON v. CITIBANK, N. A.
This text of JAMES L. ROBISON v. CITIBANK, N. A. (JAMES L. ROBISON v. CITIBANK, N. A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
JAMES L. ROBISON,
Appellant,
v.
CITIBANK, N.A. and U.S. BANK,
Appellees.
No. 2D22-904, 2D22-2591 CONSOLIDATED
February 28, 2024
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Andrea McHugh and Stephen M. Walker, Judges.
James L. Robison, pro se.
James H. Wyman, B.C.S. of Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Coral Gables, for Appellee Citibank, N.A.
No appearance for Appellee U.S. Bank.
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the portion of the appeal in case number 2D22-2591 challenging the trial court's July 12, 2022, denial of James L. Robison's motion to disqualify the trial judge. See Sutton v. State, 975 So. 2d 1073, 1076 (Fla. 2008) ("[P]rohibition is . . . recognized as the proper avenue for immediate review of whether a motion to disqualify a trial judge has been correctly denied."). We find no merit to the remaining issues Robison has raised on appeal and otherwise affirm without comment. Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.
SLEET, C.J., and KELLY and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JAMES L. ROBISON v. CITIBANK, N. A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-l-robison-v-citibank-n-a-fladistctapp-2024.