James L. Merinar v. Parkersburg Police Force Parkersburg Welfare Officials State Farm Insurance Company

74 F.3d 1232, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38849, 1996 WL 26750
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 1996
Docket95-7361
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1232 (James L. Merinar v. Parkersburg Police Force Parkersburg Welfare Officials State Farm Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James L. Merinar v. Parkersburg Police Force Parkersburg Welfare Officials State Farm Insurance Company, 74 F.3d 1232, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38849, 1996 WL 26750 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1232
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James L. MERINAR, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
PARKERSBURG POLICE FORCE; Parkersburg Welfare Officials;
State Farm Insurance Company, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7361.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996
Decided Jan. 24, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-536-6)

James L. Merinar, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Merinar v. Parkersburg Police, No. CA-95-536-6 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1232, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38849, 1996 WL 26750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-l-merinar-v-parkersburg-police-force-parkers-ca4-1996.