James L. Menefee, Sr. and Shirley Flanagan-Menefee v. Julio Cesar Reyes Martinez, Ahmad H. Ali and Natalie Morales
This text of James L. Menefee, Sr. and Shirley Flanagan-Menefee v. Julio Cesar Reyes Martinez, Ahmad H. Ali and Natalie Morales (James L. Menefee, Sr. and Shirley Flanagan-Menefee v. Julio Cesar Reyes Martinez, Ahmad H. Ali and Natalie Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 4, 2022
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00350-CV ——————————— JAMES L. MENEFEE, SR. AND SHIRLEY FLANAGAN-MENEFEE A/K/A SHIRLEY F. FLANAGON, Appellants V. JULIO CESAR REYES MARTINEZ, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1169910
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants, James L. Menefee, Sr. and Shirley Flanagan-Menefee, also
known as Shirley F. Flanagon, have failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P.
38.6(a) (governing time to file brief). On June 28, 2021, appellants filed a notice of
appeal from the trial court’s June 24, 2021 Judgment and Order for Possession. The appellate record was due to be filed by August 23, 2021. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 35.1. The clerk’s record was filed with the Clerk of this Court on June 30,
2021. On July 23, 2021, the court reporter notified the Court that there was no
reporter’s record for this case. Accordingly, appellants’ brief was due to be filed on
or before August 23, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), (d). However, no brief was
filed.
On August 31, 2021, appellants were notified by the Court that this appeal
was subject to dismissal unless a brief, or motion to extend time to file a brief, was
filed within ten days of the Court’s notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing
failure of appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal
for want of prosecution), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure
to comply with order of this Court). On September 10, 2021, appellants filed a
motion requesting a thirty-day extension of the deadline for filing their brief. On
September 13, 2021, the Court granted appellants’ motion, extending the deadline
to file their appellants’ brief to October 22, 2021. No brief was filed by the extended
deadline.
On October 25, 2021, appellants filed a second request for an extension of the
deadline to file their appellants’ brief. The Court granted the motion, extending the
deadline for filing appellants’ brief to November 12, 2021. However, no brief was
filed by the extended deadline. Accordingly, on December 6, 2021, appellants were
2 notified that their appeal was subject to dismissal unless a brief was filed within ten
days of the Court’s notice. Despite the Court’s notice that this appeal was subject to
dismissal, appellants failed to file a brief or otherwise respond to the Court’s
December 6, 2021 notice.
On May 11, 20224, appellants were again notified by the Court that this appeal
was subject to dismissal unless appellants filed a brief within ten days of the date of
the notice. Appellants have not adequately responded.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Landau, Guerra, and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James L. Menefee, Sr. and Shirley Flanagan-Menefee v. Julio Cesar Reyes Martinez, Ahmad H. Ali and Natalie Morales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-l-menefee-sr-and-shirley-flanagan-menefee-v-julio-cesar-reyes-texapp-2022.