James Kurtz v. State
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ August 03, 2015
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A15A2154. JAMES KURTZ v. THE STATE.
In 2005, a jury convicted James Kurtz of several sexual offenses. In 2007, we affirmed the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial. Kurtz v. State, 287 Ga. App. 823 (652 SE2d 858) (2007). Kurtz later filed a motion for an evidentiary hearing and demand for a new trial, which the trial court treated as an extraordinary motion for a new trial and denied in April 2015. Kurtz then filed a notice of appeal to this Court. We lack jurisdiction.
An order denying an extraordinary motion for a new trial must be appealed by application for discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7); Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). Thus, Kurtz is not entitled to a direct appeal from the order he challenges, and this direct appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/03/2015
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James Kurtz v. State (James Kurtz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.