James Kurtz v. State
This text of James Kurtz v. State (James Kurtz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ August 03, 2015
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A15A2154. JAMES KURTZ v. THE STATE.
In 2005, a jury convicted James Kurtz of several sexual offenses. In 2007, we affirmed the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial. Kurtz v. State, 287 Ga. App. 823 (652 SE2d 858) (2007). Kurtz later filed a motion for an evidentiary hearing and demand for a new trial, which the trial court treated as an extraordinary motion for a new trial and denied in April 2015. Kurtz then filed a notice of appeal to this Court. We lack jurisdiction. An order denying an extraordinary motion for a new trial must be appealed by application for discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7); Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). Thus, Kurtz is not entitled to a direct appeal from the order he challenges, and this direct appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/03/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Kurtz v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-kurtz-v-state-gactapp-2015.