James Klinkner v. The Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Company

301 F.2d 907, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5198
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMay 3, 1962
Docket13878
StatusPublished

This text of 301 F.2d 907 (James Klinkner v. The Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Klinkner v. The Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Company, 301 F.2d 907, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5198 (3d Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was tried to the court. A judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff-appellant but the total amount of damages awarded him was diminished by 40% by reason of his contributory negligence. It is from this reduction that he has appealed. We can perceive no error in what the trial court did. The diminution finds adequate support in the evidence of the contributory negligence of the appellant. Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 53. Accordingly the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
301 F.2d 907, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-klinkner-v-the-pittsburgh-west-virginia-railway-company-ca3-1962.