James Kirk v. State
This text of James Kirk v. State (James Kirk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 5, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00711-CR
NO. 14-05-00712-CR
JAMES KIRK, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 182nd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 1010262, and 943,857
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
A jury convicted appellant of aggravated sexual assault of a child (Cause No. 1010262, No. 14-05-00711-CR on appeal) and injury to a child (Cause No. 943, 857, No. 14-05-00712-CR on appeal). On June 24, 2005, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for twenty years and five years, respectively, in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice; the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Appellant filed a notice of appeal in each cause.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed January 5, 2006.
Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman, and Guzman.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Kirk v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-kirk-v-state-texapp-2006.