James Kevin Keel v. Bo Stallman
Opinion
Opinion issued March 10, 2026
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00177-CV ——————————— JAMES KEVIN KEEL, Appellant V. BO STALLMAN, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 & Probate Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Case No. CI68011
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, proceeding pro se, filed a brief on September 8, 2025 that failed to
comply with most of the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1.
On October 7, 2025, the Court issued an order directing appellant to file a corrected
brief addressing the listed deficiencies by October 27, 2025 or the Court might dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1, 38.9. Appellant filed a brief on October
31, 2025 that failed to correct the deficiencies listed in the Court’s October 7, 2025
order. On November 5, 2025, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, asserting
that appellant had failed to correct the deficiencies in the Court’s order.
Because appellant has not filed a brief in compliance with this Court’s October
7, 2025 order, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Dokupil.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James Kevin Keel v. Bo Stallman (James Kevin Keel v. Bo Stallman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.