James Kenneth Collins v. Stacey Leigh Collins

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 19, 2011·No. 01-10-00565-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued May 19, 2011

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-10-00565-CV

———————————

james kenneth collins, Appellant

V.

stacey leigh collins, Appellee

On Appeal from the 221st District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 040100621CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

          Appellant, James Kenneth Collins, has neither established indigence, nor paid all the required fees.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2010) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in Tex. R. App. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals).  After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

          We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. 

          We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland and Massengale.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Kenneth Collins v. Stacey Leigh Collins, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

James Kenneth Collins v. Stacey Leigh Collins (James Kenneth Collins v. Stacey Leigh Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.