James K. Champion v. Attorney Discipline Board
This text of James K. Champion v. Attorney Discipline Board (James K. Champion v. Attorney Discipline Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
137177 & (3)(4) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. JAMES K. CHAMPION, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff, Justices
v SC: 137177 ADB: 08-84-GA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The motion for stay of proceedings is DENIED as moot.
CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal to consider adopting an appearance of impropriety standard.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 19, 2008 _________________________________________ p0916 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James K. Champion v. Attorney Discipline Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-k-champion-v-attorney-discipline-board-mich-2008.