James Julian, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Fairfax County Circuit Court

James Julian, Inc. v. Commonwealth

18 Va. Cir. 47, 1988 Va. Cir. LEXIS 326

CourtFairfax County Circuit Court

DecidedSeptember 21, 1988

DocketCase No. (Law) 80388

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Va. Cir. 47 (James Julian, Inc. v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Fairfax County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Julian, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 18 Va. Cir. 47, 1988 Va. Cir. LEXIS 326 (Va. Super. Ct. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

By JUDGE THOMAS J. MIDDLETON

This matter came before the Court on Defendant’s Demurrer to the Amended Motion for Judgment for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with mandatory statutory procedure. Defendant’s Demurrer is overruled for the following reasons.

It is the opinion of this Court that the Comptroller is not a necessary party to an action for a contract claim against the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation. As this Court reads Va. Code § 33.1-386 et seq., the legislature has provided very comprehensive administrative procedures for submitting claims against the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation (VDHT) which are to be followed independently from the more general administrative procedures addressed in § 8.01-192 et seq. Section 33.1-386 addresses a very different scheme for. submitting contract claims against VDHT which are not initiated with an agency head and which do not involve submission to the Comptroller, as other types of agency claims are handled. The distinctions between claims under the two statutes are preserved up through the judicial proceedings, providing for separate venue, for bench trials over jury trials, and for separate statute of limitations. Such distinctions convince this Court the intent of the legislature is to have claims against VDHT controlled by this separate statute. This cause is to be continued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By JUDGE THOMAS J. MIDDLETON

This matter came before the Court on Defendant’s Demurrer to the Amended Motion for Judgment for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with mandatory statutory procedure. Defendant’s Demurrer is overruled for the following reasons.

It is the opinion of this Court that the Comptroller is not a necessary party to an action for a contract claim against the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation. As this Court reads Va. Code § 33.1-386 et seq., the legislature has provided very comprehensive administrative procedures for submitting claims against the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation (VDHT) which are to be followed independently from the more general administrative procedures addressed in § 8.01-192 et seq. Section 33.1-386 addresses a very different scheme for. submitting contract claims against VDHT which are not initiated with an agency head and which do not involve submission to the Comptroller, as other types of agency claims are handled. The distinctions between claims under the two statutes are preserved up through the judicial proceedings, providing for separate venue, for bench trials over jury trials, and for separate statute of limitations. Such distinctions convince this Court the intent of the legislature is to have claims against VDHT controlled by this separate statute. This cause is to be continued.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Va. Cir. 47, 1988 Va. Cir. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-julian-inc-v-commonwealth-vaccfairfax-1988.