James Joseph Owens v. State of Maryland
This text of 21 F.3d 423 (James Joseph Owens v. State of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
21 F.3d 423
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Joseph OWENS, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
STATE of Maryland, Respondent Appellee.
No. 94-6032.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided April 5, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-93-3973-JFM).
James Joseph Owens, Appellant Pro Se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Owens v. Maryland, No. CA-93-3973-JFM (D.Md. Dec. 15, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 F.3d 423, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15866, 1994 WL 112757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-joseph-owens-v-state-of-maryland-ca4-1994.