James Joseph Owens v. John M. Pettibone

Fourth Circuit

James Joseph Owens v. John M. Pettibone

54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17431, 1995 WL 298109

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 17, 1995

Docket94-7232

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 773 (James Joseph Owens v. John M. Pettibone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Joseph Owens v. John M. Pettibone, 54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17431, 1995 WL 298109 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Joseph OWENS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John M. PETTIBONE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-7232.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 21, 1995.
Decided May 17, 1995.

James Joseph Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Richard M. Kastendieck, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief in this action seeking to overturn a 1968 conviction from which he has been fully released and to expunge that conviction from his criminal record. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Owens v. Pettibone, No. CA-94-841-JFM (D.Md. Sept. 9, 1994). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for default judgment is denied.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Joseph OWENS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John M. PETTIBONE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-7232.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 21, 1995.
Decided May 17, 1995.

James Joseph Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Richard M. Kastendieck, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief in this action seeking to overturn a 1968 conviction from which he has been fully released and to expunge that conviction from his criminal record. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Owens v. Pettibone, No. CA-94-841-JFM (D.Md. Sept. 9, 1994). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for default judgment is denied.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17431, 1995 WL 298109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-joseph-owens-v-john-m-pettibone-ca4-1995.