James Jonathan Mapp v. The Board of Education of the City of Chattanooga
This text of 527 F.2d 1388 (James Jonathan Mapp v. The Board of Education of the City of Chattanooga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
This cause, 6 Cir., 525 F.2d 169, came on for hearing on the petition for rehearing with a suggestion that it be reheard en banc.
Judges Edwards and McCree having requested en banc rehearing for the reasons set forth in Judge Edwards’ dissenting opinion, but it appearing to the court that less than a majority of the court has voted in favor thereof, the petition for rehearing was referred to the panel which originally heard the appeal and was determined not to be well taken, Judge Edwards dissenting.
It is therefore ordered that the petition for rehearing be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
527 F.2d 1388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-jonathan-mapp-v-the-board-of-education-of-the-city-of-chattanooga-ca6-1976.