James J. White & Co. v. de Tarnowsky

Appellate Court of Illinois

James J. White & Co. v. de Tarnowsky

202 Ill. App. 234, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 900

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedDecember 18, 1916

DocketGen. No. 22,444

StatusPublished

This text of 202 Ill. App. 234 (James J. White & Co. v. de Tarnowsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James J. White & Co. v. de Tarnowsky, 202 Ill. App. 234, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 900 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Contracts, § 44*—what essential 'to make a contract where acceptance varies -from offer. To make a contract a proposition must be unconditionally accepted, and interpolation in the acceptance of any new condition or any departure from the exact terms of the proposition constitutes a new offer, and before the parties are bound such new offer must be unconditionally accepted by the party making the original proposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Contracts, § 44*—what essential 'to make a contract where acceptance varies -from offer. To make a contract a proposition must be unconditionally accepted, and interpolation in the acceptance of any new condition or any departure from the exact terms of the proposition constitutes a new offer, and before the parties are bound such new offer must be unconditionally accepted by the party making the original proposition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 Ill. App. 234, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-j-white-co-v-de-tarnowsky-illappct-1916.