James J. White & Co. v. de Tarnowsky

Appellate Court of Illinois

James J. White & Co. v. de Tarnowsky

202 Ill. App. 234, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 900

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided December 18, 1916·No. Gen. No. 22,444·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Contracts, § 44*—what essential 'to make a contract where acceptance varies -from offer. To make a contract a proposition must be unconditionally accepted, and interpolation in the acceptance of any new condition or any departure from the exact terms of the proposition constitutes a new offer, and before the parties are bound such new offer must be unconditionally accepted by the party making the original proposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Contracts, § 44*—what essential 'to make a contract where acceptance varies -from offer. To make a contract a proposition must be unconditionally accepted, and interpolation in the acceptance of any new condition or any departure from the exact terms of the proposition constitutes a new offer, and before the parties are bound such new offer must be unconditionally accepted by the party making the original proposition.

James J. White & Co. v. de Tarnowsky, 202 Ill. App. 234, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 900 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

202 Ill. App. 234 (James J. White & Co. v. de Tarnowsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.